Portland Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy Lawyer Portland Or

Portland Bankruptcy Attorney
CALL 503-380-7822
email-iconmap-marker
  • Home
  • Bankruptcy
    • Personal Bankruptcy
    • Business Bankruptcy
    • Foreclosure
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Estate Planning
  • About
  • Contact

Justice Moves Slowly, Even When (Especially When) It Involves Anna Nicole Smith

August 11, 2011 by Chris Kane

In the American legal system, when there are hundreds of millions of dollars at stake, and both sides ready to fight to the death, litigation can drag out for many years. In Anna Nicole Smith’s extreme case, it dragged on for 16 years, and finally got resolved in the United States Supreme Court a few weeks ago, more than four years AFTER her death. She fought to the death and way beyond.

After all that, the deciding Supreme Court opinion was 100% about bankruptcy–the power of the federal bankruptcy courts over state courts.

It came down to a fight between a Texas probate court and a California bankruptcy court. The Texas court had ruled in favor of the heirs of Anna Nicole Smith’s deceased husband, J. Howard Marshall II, shutting Anna Nicole out of any inheritance. The bankruptcy court in California had ruled in favor of Anna Nicole, at one point awarding her $474 million, later reduced to $89 million. (Apparently this was still enough to keep fighting about!) The Supreme Court decided in favor of the Texas court and against the bankruptcy court. Anna Nicole’s heirs lost and get nothing. Her long-deceased husband’s heirs get his whole estate. About $1.6 billion.

But in the long run, the real losers might well be the bankruptcy courts, and the people who file bankruptcy. At least those relatively few of them who end up in litigation in the midst of their bankruptcies.

That’s because in its 5-to-4 split decision, the Supreme Court decided that the bankruptcy court had accurately followed the statute which effectively gave it power over the state probate court, BUT that statute was unconstitutional—it gave the bankruptcy court more power than the Constitution allowed.

In doing so the Supreme Court upset a very careful balancing act that Congress had created and the courts have been following for several decades. Simply put, some cases that would have been resolved in bankruptcy court, now no longer will be. Why this matters for some of our clients is that bankruptcy court is usually the most efficient—meaning least expensive—place to resolve legal disputes with their creditors. It can take two or three times as much attorney time—so, that much more in attorney fees—if we need to jump out of bankruptcy court into state court or federal district court. If our clients have a strong argument—a “counterclaim”—why they don’t owe a debt, it may well become much harder to raise that argument, and so in practical terms, raising that counterclaim may just not be worth it. When justice is just too expensive, justice is denied.

But the Supreme Court, at least the narrow majority that decided this case, doesn’t think it needs to think in practical terms. It paid no attention to this argument by the dissenting justices:

[U]nder the majority’s holding, the federal district judge, not the bankruptcy judge, would have to hear and resolve the counterclaim. Why is that a problem? . . .  . Because under these circumstances, a constitutionally required game of jurisdictional ping-pong between courts would lead to inefficiency, increased cost, delay, and needless additional suffering among those faced with bankruptcy.

Think what you will about the sad story of Anna Nicole Smith. It is maddening that her epic legal battle for a share of her deceased husband’s estate slapped down by the highest court in the land deciding to make it that much harder for the already oppressed to find justice.

Filed Under: Bankruptcy History

Welcome to the Portland Bankruptcy Law Blog

I'd like to help you overcome your financial problems. One good way to start is to provide you with accurate and timely information about the bankruptcy laws. I do that here through informative blog posts, with a new one published here every week. I've been doing this for years so there is a wealth of information for you here.

But please be aware that since you are unique person you need a highly personalized solution to your challenges. That requires the analysis and advice of a conscientious and highly experienced attorney. That's really the only sensible way to get the benefit of the many powerful and effective remedies that the law provides.

So I hope the information provided here is helpful to you. Please contact me for guidance to a much better place:

503-380-7822

Recent Posts

  • No link found between bankruptcy and employment prospects
  • Creditor found in violation of automatic bankruptcy stay
  • What are the short- and long-term credit impacts of bankruptcy?
  • Bankruptcy Attorney Portland, Or | Bankruptcy Lawyer Oregon | Christopher J. Kane P.C.

Categories of Blog Posts

  • Portland Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Personal Bankruptcy
  • Business Bankruptcy
  • Stop Foreclosure
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Filing Bankruptcy in Oregon
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog

FREE CONSULTATION

GET A FREE CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION THIS MONTH.
*Please see below.

CONTACT

Christopher J. Kane, P.C.

Address: 2207 NE Broadway, Suite 100, Portland OR 97232

Phone: 503-380-7822

Email: chris@ckanelaw.com


We are a debt relief agency.

We proudly help people understand their options and, if appropriate, help them file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.

DIRECTIONS

CONNECT

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
Best Bankruptcy lawyers in Portland
Best Bankruptcy Lawyers in Portland

* Using this form, or email, for communicating with us does not establish an attorney-client relationship, until we do that in writing. So please do not send confidential or time-sensitive information through this form or by email. You affirm that you have read and understand this disclaimer.
CAUTION: This website is to provide visitors with basic information about our firm, and information about how to contact us. Every situation is different, and no information on this website is legal advice on any specific question. You should not act on any of the information without first conferring with an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. No attorney-client relationship or privilege is formed by visiting this site or by unsolicited email. Therefore, initial emails should not contain any confidential information. We may already represent parties adverse to you and cannot advise or represent you until we check for conflicts. We are licensed only in Oregon and offer our services only to those doing business in Oregon, unless we are associated with local counsel in accordance with other states laws. The applicable laws may have changed after the information on this website was published. While effort is made to keep the information current, you should not presume that all information is up to date. You must confer with an attorney to be sure you have current information.
Copyright © 2021 · Christopher J. Kane Attorney at Law · 503-380-7822 · Designed by Artizon Digital