Portland Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy Lawyer Portland Or

Portland Bankruptcy Attorney
CALL 503-380-7822
email-iconmap-marker
  • Home
  • Bankruptcy
    • Personal Bankruptcy
    • Business Bankruptcy
    • Foreclosure
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Estate Planning
  • About
  • Contact

Making Sense of Bankruptcy: The Truth about Qualifying to File a Chapter 7 Case

August 7, 2015 by Chris Kane

The reality is that most people who want to file a “straight bankruptcy” Chapter 7 case can do so; if not, Chapter 13 may be better anyway.

 

Here’s the sentence we’re exploring today:

Although there’s some understandable confusion about this, if a Chapter 7 bankruptcy would genuinely be a good solution for you then you’d likely qualify based on your income alone, or by passing the “means test”; otherwise Chapter 13 may either be a good backup or the better solution anyway.

Understandable Confusion

Determining whether you qualify to file a Chapter 7 case is usually less complicated than it seems. But it’s perfectly understandable if it seems complicated. That’s because 10 years ago a major new bankruptcy law went into effect—the so-called Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”)—which is still sowing seeds of confusion.

One of the main purposes of BAPCPA was to discourage people from filing Chapter 7 bankruptcies. It did so directly by creating some extra hurdles, with the most important one being the “means test.” But news about the new law also discouraged bankruptcy filing indirectly by spreading the word that filing bankruptcy was harder than before, and that impression continues to some degree still a decade later.

Part of the reason that this impression persists is that BAPCPA dumped an astoundingly difficult to understand set of changes onto the Bankruptcy Code. Some parts seem to directly contradict other parts. So bankruptcy judges and courts of appeal all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court have been trying to understand the badly drafted law. If it’s difficult for judges to make sense of BAPCPA, it’s only natural for ordinary people to get misimpressions about it. It’s easy to see how a concern about qualifying to file a Chapter 7 case under this now not-so-new law still gets blown out of proportion of the reality.  

If You’re Like Most People, Your Income Will Enable You to Skip the “Means Test

The “means test” is the main mechanism for qualifying to file a Chapter 7 case. It’s a multi-part formula for determining—based on your income, expenses, and debts—whether you should be in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” case. Some of those parts of the test are mind-numbingly confusing.

But the good news is, first, that most people who need a Chapter 7 case can qualify for it. And second, they do so by having low enough income to be able to skip the complicated expense and debts parts of the “means test.”

There are still some odd aspects (such as how your income is calculated for the “means test), but basically if your income is no more than the published median income amount for your state and family size, then you qualify for Chapter 7 without needing to go through any more of the  “means test.”

Also, certain kinds of folks can skip the “means test” no matter the amount of their income, specifically present or recent business owners who have more business debt than consumer debt, and certain military personnel.

Even if You Must Pass the “Means Test,” That Can Be Easy

Even if you are a consumer debtor whose income is higher than the applicable median income amount, because of the way income is calculated (fixating on your last 6 full calendar months of money received from just about all sources), each month your income can change. So through some perfectly legitimate timing strategies you may be able to lower your income to bring it under the applicable median amount.

And even if that’s not possible, you can often pass the “means test” by subtracting appropriate expenses from your income to show you have either no “disposable income” or not enough to disqualify you from Chapter 7.

In any event, getting past the “means test” is often not difficult.

Chapter 13 is Not a Bad Alternative, and Sometimes the Best One

If a person does not qualify under Chapter 7 because of too much “disposable income,” filing a Chapter 13 case instead usually results in the person paying only a small portion of her or her debts, making it not such a bad deal.  

Also, Chapter 13 comes with many advantages not available under Chapter 7. For example, through “cramdown” of a vehicle loan, you may be able to reduce monthly payments and the total debt to be paid on it. So even if advantages such as this may not have been important enough to justify filing Chapter 13 voluntarily, if you’re effectively forced into Chapter 13 because of the “means test,” one or two of those advantages could mitigate the pain of being in a Chapter 13 case.

Also, sometime people are dead-set on filing a Chapter 7 case and either don’t look closely enough at Chapter 13 or are just not open to it as an option. But once they are forced to do so because of not passing the means test , they might come to realize that Chapter 13 may have been the better choice anyway. It’s not unusual for a person who just wants to file Chapter 7 case to get it over with comes to realize that Chapter 13 comes with surprising advantages. He or she may come to recognize that it was the best option and should be pursued, even if that person could pass the “means test” and qualify for a Chapter 7 case.

 

Filed Under: Chapter 7 Tagged With: Chapter 13, Chapter 7, disposable income, means test, median income, passing the means test

Welcome to the Portland Bankruptcy Law Blog

I'd like to help you overcome your financial problems. One good way to start is to provide you with accurate and timely information about the bankruptcy laws. I do that here through informative blog posts, with a new one published here every week. I've been doing this for years so there is a wealth of information for you here.

But please be aware that since you are unique person you need a highly personalized solution to your challenges. That requires the analysis and advice of a conscientious and highly experienced attorney. That's really the only sensible way to get the benefit of the many powerful and effective remedies that the law provides.

So I hope the information provided here is helpful to you. Please contact me for guidance to a much better place:

503-380-7822

Recent Posts

  • No link found between bankruptcy and employment prospects
  • Creditor found in violation of automatic bankruptcy stay
  • What are the short- and long-term credit impacts of bankruptcy?
  • Bankruptcy Attorney Portland, Or | Bankruptcy Lawyer Oregon | Christopher J. Kane P.C.

Categories of Blog Posts

  • Portland Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Personal Bankruptcy
  • Business Bankruptcy
  • Stop Foreclosure
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Filing Bankruptcy in Oregon
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog

FREE CONSULTATION

GET A FREE CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION THIS MONTH.
*Please see below.

CONTACT

Christopher J. Kane, P.C.

Address: 2207 NE Broadway, Suite 100, Portland OR 97232

Phone: 503-380-7822

Email: chris@ckanelaw.com


We are a debt relief agency.

We proudly help people understand their options and, if appropriate, help them file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.

DIRECTIONS

CONNECT

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
Best Bankruptcy lawyers in Portland
Best Bankruptcy Lawyers in Portland

* Using this form, or email, for communicating with us does not establish an attorney-client relationship, until we do that in writing. So please do not send confidential or time-sensitive information through this form or by email. You affirm that you have read and understand this disclaimer.
CAUTION: This website is to provide visitors with basic information about our firm, and information about how to contact us. Every situation is different, and no information on this website is legal advice on any specific question. You should not act on any of the information without first conferring with an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. No attorney-client relationship or privilege is formed by visiting this site or by unsolicited email. Therefore, initial emails should not contain any confidential information. We may already represent parties adverse to you and cannot advise or represent you until we check for conflicts. We are licensed only in Oregon and offer our services only to those doing business in Oregon, unless we are associated with local counsel in accordance with other states laws. The applicable laws may have changed after the information on this website was published. While effort is made to keep the information current, you should not presume that all information is up to date. You must confer with an attorney to be sure you have current information.
Copyright © 2021 · Christopher J. Kane Attorney at Law · 503-380-7822 · Designed by Artizon Digital